Getting to the Big through the Small
Let's start with this short poem by Rae Armantrout:
Most of us get at larger concepts, though, through the particular. I know it's long, but muster the patience to at least skim through this beautiful, meandering poem by Gary Snyder, perfect for these blistering days of record-breaking heat:
What interests the hell out of me is that lots of the more current of the 355 poems on the topic of friends and enemies on the Poetry Foundation's site are short elegies. They lament the loss of a friend and get at the heart of human emotion around friendship by talking about their friend.
It was Williams who said, "No ideas but in things." Think "The Red Wheelbarrow."
So all this is to say that I'm currently--in my head only--writing a poem about the loss of a friendship. It was a rather long friendship with multiple ups and downs, but a great one overall. Now it's almost gone completely, a small blip left on the screen of an analog TV for the few seconds after you turned it off. And I don't want the details to be too specific in the poem, so as not to slip too deeply into sentimentality. However, remaining too detached or removed from the subject could chance it being too trapped in aloof abstraction. Where's the line?
Mark Strand seems to cleverly circumvent this whole problem by writing in the second person, allowing the reader to fill in the gaps of specificity with the self. I make sure and watch this video at least three or four times every year, especially in winter. Here's the elegant Mary-Louise Parker reading Strand's spare, gorgeous, haunting "Lines for Winter":
This is actually one of the few poems about friendship and relationship on the Poetry Foundation's website on the topic of friendship. It is also, I believe, one of the few on this topic that manages to approach the topic from an angle of abstraction. No names are mentioned here. Barely a hint of specific life experiences. Her terse lines somehow manage to evoke the cockiness of young artist friends in a removed manner without emotional reminiscence. Surely, Ms. Armantrout is a master, an exception. Another would be Picasso tackling sadness via his Blue Period. Yes, his paintings are about specific things, though with an abstract approach, using colors that evoke--in our Western minds--gloom and cold.
Our Nature
The very flatness
of portraitsmakes for nostalgiain the connoisseur.Here’s the latestlittle lip of waveto flattenand spread thin.Let’s sayit shows our recklessness,our fast gun,our self-consciousnesswhich was reallyour infatuationwith our own fame,our escapes,the easy waywe’d blend inwith the peasantry,our loyaltyto our old gangfrom among whomit was our natureto be singled out
Most of us get at larger concepts, though, through the particular. I know it's long, but muster the patience to at least skim through this beautiful, meandering poem by Gary Snyder, perfect for these blistering days of record-breaking heat:
Snyder is only able to eventually make his way to a discussion of the "foolish loving spaces" by guiding us through every little detail of a West Coast landscape, and all the flora and human fauna that comes with it.
Finding the Space in the Heart
I first saw it in the sixties,driving a Volkswagen camperwith a fierce gay poet and alovely but dangerous girl with a husky voice,we came down from Canadaon the dry east side of the ranges. Grand Coulee, BlueMountains, lava flow caves,the Alvord desert—pronghorn ranges—and the glittering obsidian-paveddirt track toward Vya,seldom-seen roads late September andthick frost at dawn; thenfollow a canyon and suddenly open tosilvery flats that curved over the edgeO, ah! Theawareness of emptinessbrings forth a heart of compassion!We followed the rim of the playato a bar where the roads endand over a pass into Pyramid Lakefrom the Smoke Creek side,by the ranches of wizardswho follow the tipi path.The next day we reached San Franciscoin a time when it seemedthe world might head a new way.And again, in the seventies, back fromMontana, I recklessly pulled off the highwaytook a dirt track onto the flats,got stuck—scared the kids—slept the night,and the next day sucked free and went on.Fifteen years passed. In the eightiesWith my lover I went where the roads end.Walked the hills for a day,looked out where it all drops away,discovered a pathof carved stone inscriptions tucked into the sagebrush“Stomp out greed”“The best things in life are not things”words placed by an old desert sage.Faint shorelines seen high on these slopes,long gone Lake Lahontan,cutthroat trout spirit in silt—Columbian Mammoth bonesfour hundred feet up on the wave-etchedbeach ledge; curly-horneddesert sheep outlines pecked into the rock,and turned the truck onto the playaheading for know-not,bone-gray dust boiling and billowing,mile after mile, trackless and featureless,let the car coast to a halton the crazed crackedflat hard face wherewinter snow spirals, andsummer sun bakes like a kiln.Off nowhere, to be or not be,all equal, far reaches, no bounds.Sound swallowed awayno waters, no mountains, nobush no grass andbecause no grassno shade but your shadow.No flatness because no not-flatness.No loss, no gain. So—nothing in the way!—the ground is the skythe sky is the ground,no place between, justwind-whip breeze,tent-mouth leeward,time being here.We meet heart to heart,leg hard-twined to leg,with a kiss that goes to the bone.Dawn sun comes straight in the eye. The toothof a far peak called King Lear.Now in the nineties desert night—my lover’s my wife—old friends, old trucks, drawn around;great arcs of kids on bikes out there in darknessno lights—just planet Venus glintingby the calyx crescent moon,and tasting grasshoppers roasted in a pan.They all somehow swarm down here—sons and daughters in the circleeating grasshoppers grimacing,singing sūtras for the insects in the wilderness,—the wideness, thefoolish loving spacesfull of heart.Walking on walking,under foot earth turnsStreams and mountains never stay the same.The space goes on.But the wet black brushtip drawn to a point,lifts away.Marin-an 1956—Kitkitdizze 1996
What interests the hell out of me is that lots of the more current of the 355 poems on the topic of friends and enemies on the Poetry Foundation's site are short elegies. They lament the loss of a friend and get at the heart of human emotion around friendship by talking about their friend.
It was Williams who said, "No ideas but in things." Think "The Red Wheelbarrow."
So all this is to say that I'm currently--in my head only--writing a poem about the loss of a friendship. It was a rather long friendship with multiple ups and downs, but a great one overall. Now it's almost gone completely, a small blip left on the screen of an analog TV for the few seconds after you turned it off. And I don't want the details to be too specific in the poem, so as not to slip too deeply into sentimentality. However, remaining too detached or removed from the subject could chance it being too trapped in aloof abstraction. Where's the line?
Mark Strand seems to cleverly circumvent this whole problem by writing in the second person, allowing the reader to fill in the gaps of specificity with the self. I make sure and watch this video at least three or four times every year, especially in winter. Here's the elegant Mary-Louise Parker reading Strand's spare, gorgeous, haunting "Lines for Winter":
The themes of loneliness, growing older, and death come through incredibly strongly, but only because the poet forces you to think of your own loneliness, your own age, and your own impending death by placing you at the fore of the action. No need to describe some character we've never met before. No need to try and describe, for example, death as an abstract concept. All of us, whether subconsciously or not, have thought about this things at length before. Strand is just reminding us that we've done so.
So, how do I write an ode to a lost friendship? Maybe I'll just remind you about yours. Sorry.
Comments
Post a Comment